The case studies of the thesis (chapter 5): what each step of environmental
ambition costs, in capital or in value. An analysis solves ten to forty plans one after another, so it
runs in the background; this page follows it and draws it when it is done.
Your analyses
Loading your analyses…
None yet: start one above.
| Analysis |
Country |
Status |
Actions |
|
Status |
NPV |
CapEx |
Emissions |
Recovered |
Diverted |
Hierarchy |
Built |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CapEx ceiling
Guardrail
G{level}
{from}–{to}
Lowest emissions at each capital ceiling
Highest diversion at each capital ceiling
Highest recovery at each capital ceiling
Highest NPV as the guardrail tightens
Every point is its own plan with at most that much capital over ten years and no annual budget; the dashed line is its NPV, the dotted line the current system.
Each point Gk asks for k % less emissions than the current system, and k points more recovery and diversion, over ten years; its colour is the plan's hierarchy score.
{country} at a discount rate of {rate}, data version {version}.
{objective}
NPV
Current system
The ladder
Capital ceiling, ten years
CapEx, ten years
From {level} on no plan meets the guardrails: the ladder stops there.
{level} was not solved in time: the ladder stops there.
{level} would ask for more than all of the supply recovered or diverted: the ladder stops before it.
{process} (year {year})
Solved with CBC on {platform} in {seconds} s
{level}: NPV {npv}, CapEx {capex}
